Skip to content

CCIT methods compared

An IV bag moves, stretches and changes shape. It may be wet after autoclaving, sealed inside an over-wrap, divided into chambers or filled with several litres of solution.

A method that works well on a glass vial may lose sensitivity on a bag, need the bag to be dry or unwrapped, or destroy the unit it tests. USP <1207> asks manufacturers to choose a method that suits the product and its package.

Method-level comparison for flexible parenteral bags
MethodTypeNon-destructiveFit for flexible bagsTypical use
Probe Position Decay™ Deterministic Yes Whole bag, wet or over-wrapped Laboratory and 100% in-line
Vacuum decay Deterministic Yes Limited by surface moisture and bag flexing Mainly laboratory
Pressure decay Deterministic Yes Better suited to rigid or empty containers Laboratory and in-line
High-voltage leak detection (HVLD) Deterministic Yes Needs a conductive liquid fill Laboratory and in-line
Laser headspace analysis Deterministic Yes Needs a gas headspace and a transparent wall Laboratory and in-line
Helium mass spectrometry Deterministic Partly: tracer gas added Very sensitive; mainly for development Laboratory
Dye ingress Probabilistic No Destroys the sample; operator reads the result Laboratory
Bubble or water-bath test Probabilistic No Operator-dependent; bag must be wetted Laboratory

This comparison is a general summary for review by ASTRACEC before publication. It names methods, not suppliers.

Is it deterministic?

USP <1207> prefers methods that give a measured value against a limit, rather than a judgement by eye.

Does it keep the bag?

A non-destructive test can be applied to every bag and the good ones released.

Does it work as packed?

Wet surfaces, over-wraps and chambers should not need to be removed or prepared for the test.

Can it run at line speed?

EU GMP Annex 1 expects 100% integrity testing for containers closed by fusion, such as IV bags.

Request a feasibility study